Effective Thursday, April 26, the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (MBHA) and the Missouri Board of Nursing (MBN) loosened the regulatory requirements which dictate the maximum distance between the location at which an Advance Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) practices and the location at which his/her collaborating physician practices.
Effective March 1, 2018, the Missouri Department of Social Services (“MDSS”) – Mo HealthNet Division (“Mo HealthNet”) began working collaboratively with the Missouri Department of Mental Health and the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services to enhance the Mo HealthNet Opioid Prescription Intervention (“OPI”) Program.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 signed into law on December 22, 2017 by President Trump added a new deduction for noncorporate taxpayers (i.e. S corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, and trusts) who have qualified business income. This deduction, found in section 199A of the Internal Revenue Code, is also referred to as the “business pass-through income deduction.”
With the effective date for the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (“CJR”) program now upon us, we wanted to take a moment to highlight key steps that affected hospitals should be pursuing if they wish to realize the benefits of – or at a minimum, avoid potential adverse consequences of – this new payment model.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) provided over $20 billion in Meaningful Use incentive payments to hospitals and eligible professionals who attested to compliance with the EHR Incentive Program (the “Program”).
On February 3, 2016, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a statement and released the opinion of the Administrative Law Judge who found in favor of the Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) determining that a home health agency, Lincare, Inc. (“Lincare”) violated the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) Privacy Rule requiring Lincare, to pay $239,800 in civil money penalties. All covered entities should review the opinion and the OCR’s comments and begin taking any and all “necessary steps” to ensure HIPAA compliance and to make certain protected health information is adequately protected.
In the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (“CMS”) Reporting and Return of Overpayments Final Rule, published February 11, 2016 (“Final Rule”), CMS has clarified some outstanding questions faced by healthcare providers and suppliers who may have received overpayments from the Medicare program.
This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court entered the much anticipated decision in King v. Burwell. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that the subsidies “are available to individuals in States that have a Federal Exchange.”
A little over a month ago the Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”), in collaboration with a number of other independent health care organizations, issued what it deemed to be “practical guidance for health care governing boards on compliance oversight.” This document is intended to assist governing boards in carrying out their compliance program oversight function under the applicable health care laws, rules and regulations.
The HIPAA Omnibus/Final Rule, published on January 25, 2013, changed the specifications for business associate agreements (BAAs). In general, covered entities were required to comply with the changes to the rule; however, rather than requiring covered entities to immediately enter into new BAAs with all business associates, the Final Rule grandfathered valid HIPAA business associate agreements entered into by the covered entity prior to that date through September 22, 2014. But now this grace period is quickly coming to an end. With the ultimate compliance deadline looming, covered entities that took advantage of this grace period will be required to ensure their grandfathered BAAs, and for that matter all their BAAs, are fully compliant with the Final Rule requirements.